Global Economic Headwinds: Tariffs Threaten Shipping While EU Grapples with Frozen Russian Assets

Key Takeaways

  • Container freight rates are projected to remain weak through fiscal year 2025, primarily due to the impact of proposed tariffs, ongoing industry overcapacity, and softer global consumer demand.
  • The European Union is moving forward with plans to utilize profits generated from approximately €200-210 billion ($300-$350 billion) in frozen Russian central bank assets to aid Ukraine, despite stern warnings from Moscow and significant legal and financial concerns raised by member states.
  • Major shipping companies, including Maersk ([MAERSK B](/stock/MAERSK B)) and Hapag-Lloyd (HLAG), are expected to face considerable pressure on profitability in 2025, with Maersk potentially experiencing a $1 billion cash burn.
  • Critics warn that the EU's approach to Russian assets could undermine global trust in Western financial systems and the integrity of the euro, while Russia has threatened direct retaliatory action.

Tariffs Cast a Shadow Over Global Shipping Outlook

The global shipping industry is bracing for a challenging period, with container freight rates anticipated to remain subdued through fiscal year 2025. This weakness is largely attributed to the potential re-implementation and expansion of tariffs by former President Donald Trump, coupled with a significant oversupply of new vessels and a general slowdown in consumer demand.

Bloomberg Intelligence indicates that President-elect Trump’s proposed policy mix, including higher tariffs, could substantially reduce demand for container shipping services in the coming year. In his first term, Trump levied tariffs of up to 25% on billions of dollars worth of Chinese imports, and new proposals in July 2025 suggested tariffs as high as 25% on goods from Japan, South Korea, and Malaysia, 20% on Vietnam, and up to 36% on products from Thailand, Indonesia, and Cambodia.

The industry's order book, representing 18% of the global fleet, is nearly double pre-pandemic levels, leading to a surge in new containership deliveries that will further depress freight rates and industrial profitability. While Houthi rebel attacks in the Red Sea have temporarily supported rates, underlying factors such as industry overcapacity, weaker consumer demand, and high inventory levels remain key risks for the sector in 2025. Shipping giants like Maersk ([MAERSK B](/stock/MAERSK B)) could see a significant decline in profitability, with a projected $1 billion cash burn next year, a stark contrast to its record $27 billion free cash flow in 2022. The tariffs are also expected to keep Panama Canal transits below capacity in 2026 and are already causing Chinese tonnage to shift out of US container trade.

EU Navigates Perilous Waters with Frozen Russian Assets

The European Union is pressing ahead with efforts to use the profits from frozen Russian central bank assets to support Ukraine, a move fraught with legal complexities and geopolitical risks. Approximately €200-210 billion (or $300-$350 billion) of Russia’s sovereign assets remain immobilized, with the majority held in European securities depositories, particularly Euroclear in Belgium.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has championed the initiative, emphasizing that Russia must be held accountable and pay for the damage caused by its aggression in Ukraine. So far, €3.7 billion in windfall profits generated from these assets have already been channeled to Ukraine. The current focus is on redirecting these profits or interest rather than an outright seizure of the principal assets.

However, the proposal faces significant opposition and warnings. Russia has explicitly stated it would take direct retaliatory action against any European country attempting to seize or use its frozen assets. Key EU member states, including Germany, Belgium, France, and Italy, have urged caution, citing concerns over the lack of a solid legal basis for outright confiscation. Critics warn that such a precedent could damage investor confidence in Western financial systems, erode trust in the euro, and potentially trigger capital flight from Europe. The debate highlights a delicate balance between supporting Ukraine and safeguarding the stability and credibility of the global financial order.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. We are not financial professionals. The authors and/or site operators may hold positions in the companies or assets mentioned. Always do your own research before making financial decisions.
Scroll to Top