South Korea Rejects U.S. House Allegations of Discrimination Against Coupang

Key Takeaways

  • South Korea's Ministry of Foreign Affairs officially rejected a U.S. House Judiciary Committee report alleging discriminatory regulatory "attacks" against Coupang (CPNG), calling the findings "one-sided."
  • The 35-page U.S. report, titled "Closed for Competition," claims Seoul's investigations into a 33.7 million-user data breach at Coupang (CPNG) violate the Korea-U.S. trade agreement.
  • Seoul maintains that all regulatory actions, including a recent $410 million (624.7 billion won) fine by the Personal Information Protection Commission, were conducted lawfully and without regard to company nationality.
  • The U.S. House Committee alleged that the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) used "coercive investigation tactics" and "early morning raids" to shield domestic Korean firms from American competition.
  • South Korean diplomats plan to re-engage the U.S. House Judiciary Committee to provide "accurate information" and prevent the dispute from impacting broader security and trade cooperation.

Seoul Rebuts "One-Sided" U.S. Congressional Report

The South Korean government has issued a firm rebuttal to an interim staff report released by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee on July 1, 2026. The report accused Seoul of a "whole-of-government assault" on Coupang (CPNG), an American-owned e-commerce giant headquartered in Seattle but operating primarily in South Korea. Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Park Il stated that the report unilaterally reflects Coupang's claims and misrepresents the facts of the ongoing regulatory investigations.

The U.S. House report alleges that South Korea has a long history of "economic discrimination" against foreign firms, using "overly burdensome regulatory requirements" and "massive fines" to punish American businesses. It specifically highlighted the KFTC’s aggressive enforcement practices, which reportedly include multi-day interrogations and the threat of criminal charges against American citizens, including Coupang interim CEO Harold Rogers.

Data Breach Probe at Center of Trade Friction

At the heart of the dispute is the South Korean investigation into a massive data leak at Coupang (CPNG) that affected approximately 33.7 million users. The U.S. House Committee characterized the probe as a "harassment campaign" that has contributed to a 40% decline in the company's market capitalization, harming U.S. investors. The report further alleged that Korea’s National Intelligence Service (NIS) directed Coupang personnel to conduct a "dangerous recovery operation" in China before later denying involvement.

South Korean authorities countered these claims, asserting that the $410 million fine imposed last month was a necessary legal response to the scale of the data breach. Seoul officials emphasized that their regulatory framework ensures a "fair business environment" for all corporations regardless of nationality. They argued that the U.S. report ignores the legal basis for the penalties, which were rooted in the unauthorized collection of online activity records and failure to protect sensitive user data.

Diplomatic Efforts to Mitigate Market Impact

Despite the sharp exchange of rhetoric, both Seoul and Washington appear keen to prevent the Coupang (CPNG) dispute from derailing broader bilateral relations. The South Korean Foreign Ministry confirmed it will contact the U.S. House Judiciary Committee again to explain that the government is "faithfully implementing" the Korea-U.S. trade agreement. Analysts suggest that the timing of the report is sensitive, as it coincides with potential new U.S. tariffs under Section 301 and ongoing security discussions.

Coupang (CPNG) released a brief statement expressing regret over the circumstances that led to the investigation. The company stated it remains committed to finding a "constructive resolution" and serving as a bridge for trade between the two nations. Market observers are closely watching whether this legislative pressure from the U.S. will lead to a reduction in the record-high fines or a softening of the KFTC's stance on digital platform regulations.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. We are not financial professionals. The authors and/or site operators may hold positions in the companies or assets mentioned. Always do your own research before making financial decisions.
Scroll to Top