Trump’s Tariff Tantrums: A Market Rollercoaster (Again)

Ah, the sweet symphony of market volatility, orchestrated once more by the maestro of unpredictability himself, former President Donald Trump. Just when you thought the global economy had found its sea legs after a series of trade-related tsunamis, a fresh wave of tariff threats has washed ashore, sending investors scrambling for their life rafts. It appears the “Art of the Deal” now includes a generous helping of “Art of the Daily Announcement via Truth Social,” keeping everyone on their toes and major indices doing the cha-cha.

The Tariff Tango: A Daily Dose of Volatility

On Monday, July 7, 2025, the market received its latest dose of Trumpian trade policy, delivered via letters posted on his preferred social media platform, Truth Social. These missives, sent to a reported 14 countries, outlined new import tariffs set to kick in on August 1, with rates soaring as high as 40%. Among the notable targets were key U.S. allies Japan and South Korea, facing a cool 25% tariff on their goods. It’s a classic move: threaten, extend deadlines, then threaten some more, ensuring maximum suspense for the global supply chain.

But wait, there’s more! Not content with merely shaking up a dozen-plus nations, Trump also took aim at specific sectors. Copper, that essential metal for everything from electric vehicles to military hardware, found itself in the crosshairs with a proposed 50% tariff on imports. This announcement, made during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, July 8, 2025, sent U.S. Comex copper futures soaring by more than 12% to a record high, marking its largest intraday gain since at least 1988. Meanwhile, shares of U.S. copper giant FCX (Freeport-McMoRan) initially spiked over 5% on Tuesday, benefiting from the prospect of reduced foreign competition, before settling to a 3.5% gain later in the session. Conversely, foreign copper producers like Southern Copper (SCCO) saw their share prices drop by 1% as they faced the brunt of the new duties.

Then came the pharmaceutical industry’s turn under the spotlight. Trump threatened “major” tariffs, potentially as high as 200%, on drug imports if companies don’t “get their act together” and reshore production to the U.S. This particular threat has been a recurring theme, with previous announcements sending shares of major pharmaceutical firms tumbling. For instance, in April, global pharmaceutical stocks plunged, with U.K.-based AstraZeneca (AZN) dropping 5% and Swiss drugmaker Novartis (NVS) losing 3% in early trading on U.S. exchanges. Top U.S. drugmakers, including Pfizer (PFE), Eli Lilly (LLY), and Merck (MRK), also shed more than 3% of their value. More recently, Indian pharmaceutical stocks fell sharply on Tuesday, July 8, with the Nifty Pharma index dropping nearly 1% in early trade, as companies like Aurobindo Pharma (down 3%) and Lupin (down 3%) faced renewed fears of U.S. trade tariffs. However, some U.S. drugmakers like JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) and AMGN (Amgen) saw slight gains or pared losses, as the market reacted to the nuance of a “grace period” for the pharmaceutical tariffs. It seems even a 200% threat can be shrugged off if there’s a promise of “a year, a year and a half” to comply.

Market’s Muted Meltdown (or Not)

The immediate market reaction to this latest round of tariff announcements was, as one might expect, a mixed bag of jitters and a curious sense of déjà vu. On Monday, July 7, U.S. stocks, measured by the three major indices, fell. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped by 0.94%, the S&P 500 slipped by 0.79%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite saw a 0.92% decline. However, by Tuesday, July 8, the markets settled into a more “choppy” performance, with the S&P 500 closing down less than 0.1%, the Dow giving back 0.4%, and the Nasdaq Composite barely eking out a gain of less than 0.1%. This “sluggish trading” suggests that Wall Street, ever the optimist (or perhaps just weary), might be betting that these tariffs are more of a negotiating tactic than a permanent fixture.

Indeed, Ross Mayfield, an investment strategist at Baird, succinctly put it: “I think today you’re basically seeing a market that doesn’t quite believe the worst of this is going to come to bear and is just kind of waiting for any sort of clarity because we seem back in that kind of phase where things change every couple of hours.” A sentiment perfectly encapsulating the Trump-era market experience. The market’s resilience, or perhaps its exhaustion, is further highlighted by the fact that the S&P 500 had rallied 25% since an earlier tariff-induced low in April, reaching near all-time highs just last week.

Individual stocks, however, felt the pinch more directly. Apple (AAPL) shares, for instance, tumbled by about 8% in early trading on Thursday, April 3, 2025, after new tariffs targeted countries where the tech giant produces its products, particularly China, where 90% of its iPhones are manufactured. This decline was part of a broader sell-off that saw the S&P 500 down more than 4% and the Nasdaq down nearly 6% on that day. More recently, on Friday, May 23, 2025, Apple shares dropped 2.5% to just over $196 after Trump threatened a 25% tariff on the company unless it shifted iPhone production to the U.S. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, ever the realist, noted that onshoring iPhone production would “more than double the cost to around $3,500 a unit,” a “non-starter” for Apple. The idea of a $3,500 iPhone? Now that’s a tariff that would certainly hit consumers.

Analyst Oracle or Just Another Echo Chamber?

The analyst community, perpetually trying to make sense of the seemingly random, offered their usual blend of caution and cautious optimism. Goldman Sachs Research economists estimate that the effective U.S. tariff rate has already risen by roughly 10 percentage points to 13% and could eventually increase by an additional 4 percentage points to 17%. They also project that S&P 500 companies’ earnings-per-share growth could decelerate to 4% this quarter, down from 12% in the first quarter, as companies struggle to offset the tariff impact. David Kostin, chief U.S. equity strategist at Goldman Sachs, noted that “clients have been keenly focused on who will ultimately shoulder the cost of tariffs,” assuming companies will pass on 70% of direct costs to consumers.

Perhaps the most illuminating (and sarcastically delightful) comment came from the White House itself. When asked about the odds of tariff-related inflation, an official reportedly compared the risk to “pandemics or meteors.” One can only assume this level of foresight is why we’re all so calm about the current economic climate. Meanwhile, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who previously suggested Trump would “cut tariff rates with a few other countries”, is now confirming that copper tariffs are indeed coming and details on pharmaceutical tariffs will be out by the end of the month. The consistency is truly breathtaking.

The Truth Social Echo Chamber

It’s worth noting the increasingly prominent role of Truth Social in this ongoing saga. Major policy announcements, including the letters outlining new tariff rates, are now routinely posted directly to the platform by Trump himself. This direct line to the market (and the world) ensures that the “Trump effect” is immediate and unfiltered, bypassing traditional media gatekeepers and adding an extra layer of real-time drama to trading desks globally. It’s a digital town crier for the 21st century, ensuring that no one misses a beat, or a tweet, that could send their portfolio spiraling (or soaring, depending on the day and the industry). The platform has become the primary conduit for the market to understand the latest twists in trade policy, which, as we’ve seen, can change “every couple of hours.”

Conclusion: The Only Constant is Change (and Tariffs)

As the August 1 deadline looms, and with it the potential for even higher tariffs on a growing list of imports, the market remains in a perpetual state of “wait and see.” The dance between threats, extensions, and actual implementation continues, leaving businesses and investors to navigate a landscape where policy shifts are as frequent as the changing tides. While some sectors, like U.S. copper mining, might see a temporary boost, the broader sentiment remains one of caution, with the IMF warning that these tariffs could cut global GDP by 0.5%. The enduring lesson from the Trump era seems to be this: when it comes to trade, expect the unexpected, prepare for the unpredictable, and always keep an eye on Truth Social. Because in this market, the only thing more reliable than a tariff threat is the ensuing scramble to figure out what it actually means. And perhaps, a wry smile at the sheer audacity of it all.

DISCLAIMER: We read Trump’s posts so you don’t have to. This is comedy meets market data, not financial advice. Not political advice either – we just like charts and chaos.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. We are not financial professionals. The authors and/or site operators may hold positions in the companies or assets mentioned. Always do your own research before making financial decisions.
Scroll to Top