{"id":50975,"date":"2025-07-25T02:00:38","date_gmt":"2025-07-25T06:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/the-art-of-the-deal-and-the-markets-whimsical-dance\/50975\/"},"modified":"2025-07-25T02:00:38","modified_gmt":"2025-07-25T06:00:38","slug":"the-art-of-the-deal-and-the-markets-whimsical-dance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/the-art-of-the-deal-and-the-markets-whimsical-dance\/50975\/","title":{"rendered":"The Art of the Deal (and the Market’s Whimsical Dance)"},"content":{"rendered":"

In a world perpetually teetering on the edge of a trade spat, one figure consistently manages to inject a potent cocktail of chaos and occasional calm into global markets: Donald J. Trump<\/a>. Recent Google Alert entries paint a vivid picture of a market that, much like a seasoned poker player, has learned to read his tells, even as the dealer keeps changing the rules.<\/p>\n

Tariff Tango: A Rhapsody in Reciprocity (and Retail Pain)<\/h2>\n

The latest round of Trump<\/a>’s tariff pronouncements has been a masterclass in the art of the unpredictable. We’ve seen “Trump announces more trade deals as deadline looms for higher tariffs on Canada”, alongside signals of a whopping “50% tariff on Brazil amid political tensions and trade disputes”. Not to be outdone, he also declared that “countries will face tariffs ranging from 15% to 50%”. It’s a veritable buffet of import taxes, with some nations getting a “deal” at 15% (Japan, Indonesia, Philippines), a rate that a year ago would have sent shivers down spines but now elicits a “sigh of relief” from economists. The sheer audacity of cheering a 15% tariff as a victory truly highlights the unique economic landscape we inhabit.<\/p>\n

But who, pray tell, is footing the bill for this grand economic experiment? While Trump famously asserts that “Tariffs are making our Country ‘BOOM'” and that foreign countries will bear the burden, the cold, hard data suggests otherwise. “US companies are stomaching the cost of higher tariffs and starting to pass it on to American consumers”. General Motors (GM<\/a>) GM<\/a>, for instance, reported that tariffs dented its profits by over $1.1 billion as it chose to absorb the blow, leading to a 6% drop in its stock after earnings. Meanwhile, companies like Nike NKE<\/a> are planning “surgical” price hikes to mitigate an expected $1 billion increase in costs. Economists, those perpetually pessimistic souls, warn that consumers could lose anywhere between $2,100 and $4,900 annually due to these rising costs, as companies are expected to pass on 60% of their tariff expenses. So, while the “Make America Great Again” hats might be made in America, the price tag is increasingly being paid by American wallets.<\/p>\n

The market’s reaction to this tariff tightrope walk has been, predictably, a mixed bag. On Wednesday, July 23, the DOW<\/a> rallied 1.1% or 507.85 points, closing at 45,010.29, its first close above 45,000 since December 2024. The S&P 500<\/a> gained 0.8% to finish at 6,358.91, marking its 12th closing high this year, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite<\/a> rose 0.6% to 21,020.02, its first close above 21,000. This “winning session” was “fueled by investor optimism about progress on trade talks and generally strong corporate earnings”. However, by Thursday, July 24, the picture was a bit more nuanced. The S&P 500<\/a> edged up a mere 0.1% to another all-time high, and the Nasdaq Composite<\/a> gained 0.2%, also adding to its record. But the Dow Jones Industrial Average<\/a> fell 0.7%. This divergence suggests that while some sectors are thriving on perceived trade wins, others are feeling the pinch of ongoing uncertainty.<\/p>\n

Tech Titans and Tariff Threats: A Peculiar Pas de Deux<\/h2>\n

Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of this market saga is the peculiar dance between Trump’s policies and the tech sector. While he threatens to “halt US tech firms’ deals with China” and “shift focus to Indian workers”, some tech giants are actually thriving.<\/p>\n

Nvidia<\/a> (NVDA<\/a>), the darling of the AI world, saw its stock rise in early trading on Thursday, July 24, as investor sentiment turned “sharply positive” following the unveiling of President Trump’s new artificial intelligence “action plan”. This plan, lauded by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, is expected to boost the U.S. semiconductor sector through deregulation, export incentives, and accelerated data center development. Shares of Nvidia<\/a> were up 2.25% on Thursday, extending a week-long rally. Analysts at Morgan Stanley reiterated Nvidia<\/a> as a top investment idea, labeling the stock “Overweight” with a price target of $185, implying a 10.8% upside from current levels, with some even more bullish targets reaching $250. It seems that even a president who once allegedly asked “what the hell is Nvidia? I’ve never heard of it before” can inadvertently boost its fortunes.<\/p>\n

Conversely, Intel<\/a> (INTC<\/a>), a traditional chipmaking powerhouse, continues to face headwinds. While its stock is up 14% year-to-date, it has “typically fared poorly post its earnings releases,” with positive returns only 25% of the time one day post-earnings over the last five years. This struggle is attributed to “considerable headwinds in its CPU business amid continued market share losses in the server and client computing space and relatively lackluster growth in the broader market,” alongside “the broader market pivot from CPUs to GPUs in the AI age”.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the cryptocurrency market, ever the wild child, is also feeling the ripple effects. XRP<\/a>, for instance, “nosedived over 11% in just a single day” on July 24, plummeting to $3.08, amid “heightened geopolitical tensions, particularly due to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff threats”. It appears even digital assets aren’t immune to the analog machinations of trade policy.<\/p>\n

Luxury Woes and Corporate Absorptions<\/h2>\n

Beyond the tech sphere, the luxury market is also feeling the squeeze. LVMH Mo\u00ebt Hennessy Louis Vuitton (LVMUY<\/a>), the luxury goods behemoth, reported a 22% drop in net profit and a 4% decline in revenues for the first half of 2025. This comes as “brands face the threat of hefty US import tariffs”. While LVMH noted “solidity in the current context” and “local demand was solid in Europe… and in the United States”, the specter of “Trump’s threat of 30% tariffs on imported EU goods risks hurting luxury houses that make products in France and Italy”. It seems even the most discerning consumers are starting to balk at ever-increasing price tags, a trend exacerbated by tariff-induced inflation.<\/p>\n

Corporate America, it seems, is largely absorbing the initial shock of these tariffs. “Neither consumers nor foreign countries are assuming much of the tariff burden. At least not yet”. Companies are “working through inventory purchased before tariffs were enacted,” but as those stockpiles dwindle, “companies will be forced to increase prices and review payrolls”. This suggests a delayed but potentially significant impact on corporate profits and, by extension, stock valuations. Analysts at Citigroup noted that if consumers and foreign firms aren’t bearing the tariff costs, “domestic firms are. That is something that eventually should be reflected in corporate earnings announcements”.<\/p>\n

The Bluster and the Bottom Line<\/h2>\n

The recurring theme is clear: President Trump’s trade policies, characterized by frequent announcements of new tariffs and the occasional “great” trade deal, create an environment of perpetual uncertainty. While the stock market has, at times, “largely brushed aside concerns about tariffs” and even rallied on “trade optimism”, there’s an underlying current of apprehension. As one analyst aptly put it, “Markets have, over the past three months, gotten largely inured to Trump’s tariff threats, viewing them more as tantrums associated with the U.S. president blowing off steam than as true statements of political intent”. The phrase “TACO tariffs” (“Trump Always Chickens Out” tariffs) has even emerged to describe these “political spasms”.<\/p>\n

Yet, despite the market’s apparent nonchalance, the economic realities are undeniable. The current effective U.S. tariff rate of 20.2% is the highest since 1911, and after consumption shifts, it’s projected to be 19.3%, the highest since 1933. These tariffs are projected to increase consumer prices by 2.0% in the short run, translating to an average short-run income loss of $2,700 per household in 2025 dollars.<\/p>\n

So, while the headlines might trumpet “great trade deals” and market records, the subtle yet persistent hum of tariff-induced costs continues to reverberate through the economy. The stock market, in its infinite wisdom, seems to be playing a long game of “wait and see,” occasionally cheering a perceived win, but always with one eye on the looming August 1 deadline and the potential for even higher tariffs. It’s a testament to the market’s resilience, or perhaps its collective amnesia, that it continues to find reasons to climb amidst such a volatile and often contradictory policy landscape.<\/p>\n

DISCLAIMER: <\/b> We read Trump’s posts so you don’t have to. This is comedy meets market data, not financial advice. Not political advice either – we just like charts and chaos.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a world perpetually teetering on the edge of a trade spat, one figure consistently manages to inject a potent […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":50312,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"rank_math_schema_Article":[],"rank_math_focus_keyword":[],"rank_math_description":[],"financial_data_references":[],"stock_symbols_mentioned":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[4331],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-trump-stock-market"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50975\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}