Ah, Friday, October 24, 2025. Another day, another series of presidential pronouncements threatening to upend global trade, and another utterly predictable, yet somehow still baffling, market reaction. It appears Wall Street has officially upgraded its relationship with presidential policy announcements from “anxious observer” to “seasoned reality TV connoisseur,” complete with popcorn and a knowing smirk. Because, despite President Donald Trump’s latest volley of tariff threats and diplomatic ultimatums, the major U.S. indices are, once again, shrugging their collective shoulders and sashaying towards new records. It seems the market has developed a rather thick skin, or perhaps, a highly selective memory, when it comes to the commander-in-chief’s trade theatrics.<\/p>\n
The day began with a truly vintage Trumpian twist: the abrupt termination of all trade negotiations with Canada. The reason? An advertisement aired by the Canadian province of Ontario, featuring none other than former U.S. President Ronald Reagan, speaking out against tariffs. In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, President Trump declared, “ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED,” citing the ad as “egregious behavior” and a “FAKE” attempt to influence a pending U.S. Supreme Court decision on tariff legality. One can almost hear the collective sigh of disbelief from Ottawa to Bay Street. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, clearly exasperated, noted that the decades-long process of economic integration between the two nations was “now over,” and that Canada would not allow “unfair U.S. access to its markets” if talks failed.<\/p>\n
The immediate currency market reaction was swift, if contained. The USD\/CAD<\/a> pair spiked around 50 pips in the minutes following Trump’s announcement, as traders quickly priced in renewed cross-border tensions. Yet, the broader impact on the U.S. markets seemed to be absorbed with a practiced ease. Perhaps investors have grown accustomed to the geopolitical equivalent of a toddler throwing a toy out of the pram. Auto manufacturers, however, are caught in the crossfire. General Motors (GM<\/a>) and Stellantis (STLA<\/a>) are now facing tariffs on some U.S.-made vehicles imported into Canada, a direct consequence of Canada’s retaliatory measures against U.S. levies. This comes despite GM<\/a> (+3%) having just reported strong Q3 results and raising its 2025 profit guidance, partly due to *lower-than-expected* tariff expenses. The irony, as they say, is palpable.<\/p>\n Not content with merely rattling the northern border, President Trump also reignited the perennial U.S.-China trade war narrative, threatening sweeping new tariffs, including a staggering 100% and even 157% on Chinese imports. This latest escalation targets tech exports and pharmaceuticals, among other goods, in what appears to be a response to China’s own export limits on rare earth minerals. The financial media, ever the dutiful chroniclers of chaos, quickly highlighted the return of “trade war worries”.<\/p>\n Flashback to earlier this month: on October 10, a similar threat of 100% tariffs on China sent the markets into a tailspin, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average<\/a> plummeting 1.90% (down 878.82 points), the S&P 500<\/a> falling 2.71% (down 182.60 points), and the Nasdaq Composite<\/a> shedding a hefty 3.56% (down 820.20 points). Technology stocks, in particular, bore the brunt of that sell-off, with the “AI trade” taking a hit. Analysts like Sam Stovall of CFRA Research noted then that the “unexpected resurrection of the trade war triggered a selloff,” fueling recession concerns.<\/p>\n Yet, today, October 24, the market’s reaction to these renewed threats is… different. While the previous tariff threat caused a sharp decline, today’s market appears to be in a more sanguine mood. Perhaps it’s the “Trump Always Chickens Out” (TACO<\/a>) theory gaining traction among traders, a cynical but often accurate observation that presidential tariff bluster frequently precedes a softening of stance. Indeed, after the previous tariff threat, President Trump quickly softened his posture, leading to a rebound in Wall Street stocks.<\/p>\n So, what’s the verdict from the trading floors on this eventful Friday? Despite the presidential pugilism, the U.S. stock market is, remarkably, having a rather good day. As of 10:15 a.m. Eastern time, the Dow Jones Industrial Average<\/a> was up a robust 411 points (+0.9%), the S&P 500<\/a> had risen 0.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite<\/a> was 1.2% higher, all heading towards new records. This seemingly contradictory upward trajectory is attributed, in part, to an “encouraging update on inflation” and expectations that the Federal Reserve will continue cutting interest rates. Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management, observed that Fed officials are currently more concerned with the labor market than inflation, suggesting further rate cuts are likely.<\/p>\n Individual stock performances offered a mixed, but generally positive, picture. Procter & Gamble<\/a> (PG<\/a>) was a standout, trading up 0.8% at $152.39 (or 1.2% at $153.11) after reporting better-than-expected fiscal first-quarter earnings and, crucially, halving its annual tariff cost estimate to approximately $400 million after tax. This suggests that some corporate giants are finding ways to mitigate, or at least better forecast, the impact of tariffs. Auto stocks also showed resilience, with General Motors<\/a> (GM<\/a>) shares surging nearly 3% on Friday morning, while Stellantis<\/a> (STLA<\/a>), despite the Canadian trade spat, was on track to finish the week up nearly 4%. This positive sentiment in the auto sector was partly attributed to “President Trump pulling back from more severe tariffs” (referring to earlier threats) and favorable regulatory changes.<\/p>\n However, not all sectors were immune to the trade winds. Soybean futures, often a bellwether for U.S.-China trade relations, fell to 1,042.38 USd\/Bu, down 0.23% from the previous day, with November delivery losing 1\u00be\u00a2 to $10.60\u00bc a bushel. This dip reflects the ongoing uncertainty for agricultural exports amid renewed tariff threats. Meanwhile, crude oil prices, specifically WTI Crude<\/a>, opened at $61.65 per barrel and were trading up 0.26% at $61.81 per barrel as of 9:21 a.m. ET, after a sharp 7% rally earlier in the week driven by new U.S. sanctions on Russian oil firms. So, while some trade disputes cause headaches, others, it seems, can inadvertently boost other commodities.<\/p>\n The prevailing sentiment among market watchers seems to be a curious blend of caution and a weary acceptance of the “new normal.” While Bernstein maintained a “neutral” recommendation on Stellantis<\/a>, citing caution regarding the group’s prospects, the broader market appears to be less shocked by presidential pronouncements than it once was. The initial “plunge” of the S&P 500<\/a> in response to tariff threats, as noted by Investopedia, has given way to a more nuanced reaction. It’s almost as if the market has learned to differentiate between a presidential tweet and an actual, sustained economic policy shift. Or perhaps, it’s just really, really good at ignoring things it doesn’t like.<\/p>\n The market’s ability to rally despite, or perhaps even in defiance of, aggressive trade rhetoric highlights a fascinating dynamic. Investors are clearly more attuned to underlying economic data, like inflation and interest rate expectations, than to the daily drama emanating from Truth Social. The recent inflation data, which came in “a bit less painful than feared,” seems to have provided a stronger tailwind for equities than presidential trade threats have provided headwinds.<\/p>\n As the trading day wraps up on October 24, 2025, the stock market continues its improbable ascent, seemingly unfazed by the latest round of trade war rhetoric. The termination of Canadian trade talks over a Ronald Reagan ad, and the renewed threats of massive tariffs on China, are merely background noise to a market more focused on inflation figures and potential Fed rate cuts. It’s a testament to the market’s adaptability, or perhaps its sheer exhaustion, that it can absorb such geopolitical volatility and still push towards new highs. For investors, it’s a reminder that in the grand theater of global finance, the show, however unpredictable, always goes on. And sometimes, the most dramatic pronouncements turn out to be just another act in a long-running, occasionally absurd, performance.<\/p>\n DISCLAIMER: <\/b> We read Trump’s posts so you don’t have to. This is comedy meets market data, not financial advice. Not political advice either – we just like charts and chaos.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ah, Friday, October 24, 2025. Another day, another series of presidential pronouncements threatening to upend global trade, and another utterly […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":50312,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"rank_math_schema_Article":[],"rank_math_focus_keyword":[],"rank_math_description":[],"financial_data_references":[],"stock_symbols_mentioned":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[4331],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-trump-stock-market"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55047\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.stockmarketwatch.com\/stock-market-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}The China Conundrum, Redux: Bigger Tariffs, Bigger Questions<\/h2>\n
Market’s Mood Swings: A Study in Contradiction<\/h2>\n
The Analyst’s Apathy (or Adaptation)<\/h2>\n
Conclusion: The Show Must Go On<\/h2>\n